
When the US invaded Iraq the first time round (ie when it was invited to do so...), much was made of missile-mounted cameras and the transformation of the war into a very immediate media spectacle.
When the US invaded Iraq the SECOND time around, it took the "media war" concept even further, embedding journalists with specific units - and in a masterstroke of PR, matched up regional journos with their local divisions, thus ensuring plenty of positive grass-roots coverage for what was otherwise a deeply unpopular war just about everywhere.
When Israel invaded Lebanon in 2006, it didn't capitalise much on getting the media onside, and suffered on that front as a result.
Now, the story is very different.
This report from The National paints a picture of an Israel determined to control the war agenda on the internet, and bombarding global users with more information than they can process.
Its target is not the Middle East, but those otherwise disinterested observers in the US and Europe - if it can persuade them it is defending itself from attacks, rather than slaughtering innocent civilians, then that's another chunk of pressure off its back.
But this a PR game - so there's no incentive to tell the truth.
In one rather harrowing
YouTube video, the IDF purports to show militants loading up a van with rockets. In eerie silence, the camera zooms in and out, before a strike is called in, leaving an expanding fireball where the van once was.
Unfortunately, they probably weren't rockets. According to Israeli human rights organisation
B'Tselem, cited in The National, the men were almost certainly moving gas canisters, as they shifted a workshop out of a damaged site.
As is all too common in the media, though, whoever gets in first gets to call the tune - and right now that's Israel, as far as the PR war is concerned.
Palestinians, and many across the Middle East and around the world, are fighting back with
images of the carnage, but as long as people believe Israel is defending itself against bad men with rockets and bombs, the sad truth is they will accept the carnage as "collateral damage".
And things like
this editorial, denying the WWII holocaust, in Gulf News of all papers, really does not help. To the outside world, this gives an image of Israelis as merciless but justified defenders, and Arabs as irrational, illogical terrorist sympathisers - if not terrorists themselves.
Neither of these labels are correct - and neither is the reverse entirely the case either. But like it or not, the Arab world has to get a lot smarter at the PR game and target not the people who will sympathise anyway, but those who do not have strong opinions either way.
AdNation doesn't do politics, but we will be carrying a token of our support for the innocent casualties in Gaza on the site for now.